Blog 8A Table of Contents

Return to Blog #8A: #8A REPs best con, “no corroboration of Ford re Kavanaugh”

REPs conned America into believing there’s no corroboration of Ford’s accusation about Kavanaugh by using their system for rejecting victims’ sexual-assault allegations

• How did they do it?
  • The worse the nominee, the better their system works
• How did we get to this point?
• The ten pillars of the Republicans’ comprehensive systematic misogynistic approach
  • Each of the ten pillars is visible in the Republicans’ conduct during the Kavanaugh proceedings
• The Kavanaugh proceedings were a successful test run of the Republicans’ systematic approach
• The Republican argument that an accused predator’s denial is credible because of its emotion needs to be retired
  • Nathan J. Robinson’s analysis of Ford’s and Kavanaugh’s credibility
  • Mr. Robinson’s take on the emotion of Kavanaugh’s testimony – it isn’t an indicator one way of the other
  • Kavanaugh’s testimony destroyed the Republican argument and also proved the Republicans were dishonest in using their argument
  • Mr. Robinson cited some of Justice Kavanaugh’s more material lies, which should have been visible to all
• Justice Kavanaugh’s testimony confessed what he knows about Republicans
• Many Republican pundits provided support for the Republican con job that they had to know was dishonest
  • Mr. Rothman
  • Mr. Rothman’s viewpoint, assuming a true he-said, she-said dispute
    • Rothman made bizarre wording choices
    • He wants to protect people from having the opportunity to think for themselves 
    • His argument about injustice is bizarre
    • His perspective involves the invention of injuries to a nominee who isn’t confirmed
  • Mr. Rothman’s viewpoint accounting for reality
    • His minimalist argument about Kavanaugh’s credibility
    • Mr. Rothman had to be aware that Justice Kavanaugh’s testimony is not credible
    • Mr. Rothman had to know the significance of the July 1, 1982 calendar entry 
    • Mr. Rothman’s action’s like Mr. Benson’s supported the Republican con job 
• Mr. Rothman’s role in supporting the con job is representative of most or all Republican pundits
  • They have knowingly revictimized Dr. Ford, repeatedly
• “We can believe Ford and confirm Kavanaugh”
  • The lesser-of-the-two-evils analysis
    • Ms. Green’s rationalization doesn’t make sense
  • The mutual credibility analysis
• The role of Ms. Mitchell’s report in producing Ms. Green’s viewpoint
• Looking Forward