Return to Blog #7D: Con job is “Ford & Kavanaugh weren’t at the same party”
- How did the discussion reach this point?
- The con job is a two-parter
- Most people were apparently confused by the con job about whether there is corroborating evidence
- The absence of corroborating witness testimony is irrelevant
- Your arguments originated with someone else, so why am I criticizing you?
- So, what is the basis of your disparagement of the conclusion that Dr. Ford was at the July 1, 1982 house-party?
- Item one:
- Item two:
- Analysis of McCormack argument
- Analysis of Benson argument
- Item three:
- Analysis of McCormack argument
- Analysis of Benson argument
- Item four:
- Item five:
- Your other post-2018 contributions to the Kavanaugh discussion
- Tweets
- Fox News
- Townhall
- What happened to Senator Sheldon’s excellent and obviously correct theory?
- The Republicans disappeared Senator Sheldon’s theory with your help
- Looking Forward