Blog 7C Table of Contents

Return to Blog #7C: Blasey Ford was “bensoned” to protect guilty Kavanaugh

Guy P. Benson, published a baseless and disingenuous article to help hide the evidence that corroborates Ford’s sexual-assault allegation against Kavanaugh

• The effects of bensoning a sexual-assault victim
• Your disinformation in defense of Justice Kavanaugh
• How did the discussion reach this point?
  • The contents of Blogs #7C and #7D
• The nine key details described by Dr. Ford
• The omission of Dr. Ford is not evidence she wasn’t there, but an admission of guilt
• Common-sense proof #1: The July 1, 1982 house-party is the event described by Dr. Ford
  • Common-sense proof #1 is simple and obvious, and there is no counterargument
• Common-sense proof #2: Dr. Ford was at the July 1, 1982, house-party
  • The probability of Dr. Ford identifying Kavanaugh would have been a fraction of 1%
  • The common-sense proof that Dr. Ford was at the July 1, 1982 house-party is obvious and compelling
• A statistical analysis concerning Dr. Ford’s presence on July 1, 1982
  • The probability that Dr. Ford was not present at the house-party is effectively 0%
• The existence of objective proof that the events are the same helps clear up an important confusion
  • Dr. Ford had been the victim of a conspiracy all along
• There are two types of corroborating evidence that support Dr. Ford’s allegation
  • Evidence that proves Dr. Ford was at the July 1, 1982, house-party
    • Everyone who thought that Kavanaugh was guilty had a rational bias for that belief, based on the visible corroborating evidence
  • Justice Kavanaugh’s corroborating admissions of guilt
    • Everyone who thought that Kavanaugh was guilty had a rational bias for that belief, based on the visible corroborating evidence
• The Republicans chose to confirm Justice Kavanaugh despite the overwhelming corroborating evidence
• There are three independent proofs of Justice Kavanaugh’s guilt
  • There is proof beyond a reasonable doubt of Justice Kavanaugh’s guilt
• You’ve contributed to the continued re-victimization of a real victim of sexual assault
  • Justice Kavanaugh’s claim that he is the victim, which you supported, is an outrage
  • Your re-victimization of Dr. Ford goes beyond the fact that your arguments are a crock
• My critique of you is not harsh. It’s well deserved based on substance and equities
• Your singular accomplishment and your culpability
  • Your accomplishment
  • Your culpability
• Looking Forward